Leveraging the Decision Support System and Simple Additive Weighting Method for Optimal Retail Location Identification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.jinav1485Keywords:
Decision Support System, Simple Additive Weighting, DSS SAW, Decision Making, ReliabilityAbstract
The decision-making process is a crucial part of any business or organization, and the Decision Support System (DSS) using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is a widely used tool for evaluating multiple options or alternatives. This study aimed to determine the best location for a new retail store using the DSS and SAW method. Four criteria were considered in the evaluation process: population density, proximity to competitors, average income, and rent cost. Data was collected and analyzed, and the weighted scores were calculated using the SAW method. The results of this study showed that Location A had the highest weighted score, and thus was determined to be the best option for the new retail store. This study provides a reliable method for evaluating multiple options and determining the best one. It also highlights the advantages of using the DSS and SAW method, such as the objective decision-making process based on data and criteria, and the high reliability of the results. Additionally, this study also points out the limitations of not using the DSS and SAW method, such as the subjective decision-making process based on personal bias and low reliability of the results. The DSS SAW method can be applied in various decision-making scenarios, and this study can serve as a guide for future research and decision-making processes.
References
Ady, S. U., & Mulyaningtyas, A. (2017). Eksplorasi Tingkat Efisiensi Pasar Modal Indonesia, Studi Kasus di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Ekspektra: Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 1(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25139/ekt.v0i0.184
Afshari, A., Mojahed, M., & Yusuff, R. (2010). Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5), 511–515. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIMT.2010.V1.89
Eniyati, S. (2011). Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan untuk Penerimaan Beasiswa dengan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting). Dinamik-Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 16(Sri Eniyati), 171–177. http://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fti1/article/view/364
Fery Romidoni Eprilianto, Tri Sagirani, T. A. (2013). “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Di Universitas Panca Marga Probolinggo.” Universitas Panca Marga Probolinggo.
Fitrul Hadi, A., Permana, R., & Syafwan, H. (2019). Decision Support System in Determining Structural Position Mutations Using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1339(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012015
Imandasari, T., & Windarto, A. P. (2018). Penerapan Metode VIKOR Pada Pemilihan Popok Bayi Berdasarkan Jenis Kulit. Seminar Nasional Sains & Teknologi Informasi (SENSASI), 215–220.
Karismariyanti, M. (2011). Simulasi Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode Composite Performance Index. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi.
Kharisman Ndruru, R. (2020). Penerapan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) Dalam Pemilihan Jaksa Terbaik Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Medan. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS), 367–372.
Sagirani, T., Virawan, M. G., & Nurcahyawati, V. (2019). Simple additive weighting method in the triage decision support system. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 3008–3012.
Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(3), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1


