OriginalPaper | Open access | Published: July 31, 2022

An Important Aspect of Satisfaction on Mobile Apps: An Usability Evaluation Based on Gender

Dessy G. Palyama, Golda Tomasila
JINAV: Journal of Information and Visualization, Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022), pp. 93-98 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.jinav1568 Published: 2022-07-31
Get Permissions

Abstract

The quality of the feasibility of a mobile application can be measured by evaluating the usability using certain testing methods. The refore to improve the performance of mobile applications, it is necessary to measure the level of satisfaction and user acceptance of the application. This study aims to improve the quality of the Myelkomsel mobile application by measuring the level of satisfaction and acceptance of end-users and evaluating the relationship between the level of user satisfaction with user gender differences using the System Usability Scale (SUS) method. Data collection was carried out by distributing questionnaires to 46 Telkomsel provider users consisting of 22 male users and 24 female users. The results showed that the average SUS score was 71.96 for the whole user. According to the calculation of the level of user acceptance included in the category of Acceptable, the scale of the class level is included in category C, and the ranking is included in the good category. While the results of calculations from the SUS Percentile Rank Score show that the MyTelkomsel mobile application is in class C. There are no significant differences according to gender, the average SUS score of the male is 71.93, and female is 71.98 so that gender differences do not affect the level of satisfaction and acceptance application. It can be seen that the level of end-user satisfaction from the MyTelkomsel mobile application is good but still has possible problems with its use

Keywords

References (19)

  1. Ahmad, Naveed, Aimal Rextin, and Um E. Kulsoom. 2018. “Perspectives on Usability Guidelines for Smartphone Applications: An Empirical Investigation and Systematic Literature Review.” Information and Software Technology 94:130–49. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2017.10.005.
  2. Brown, Benjamin, Panos Balatsoukas, Richard Williams, Matthew Sperrin, and Iain Buchan. 2018. “Multi-Method Laboratory User Evaluation of an Actionable Clinical Performance Information System : Implications for Usability and Patient Safety.” Journal of Biomedical Informatics 77(November 2017):62–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.11.008.
  3. Grier, Rebecca A., Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and S. Camille Peres. 2013. “The System Usability Scale: Beyond Standard Usability Testing.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 187–91. doi: 10.1177/1541931213571042.
  4. Harrati, Nouzha, Imed Bouchrika, Abdelkamel Tari, and Ammar Ladjailia. 2016. “Exploring User Satisfaction for E-Learning Systems via Usage-Based Metrics and System Usability Scale Analysis.” Computers in Human Behavior 61:463–71. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.051.
  5. Hsieh, Meng Hsueh, Yu Ching Chen, and Chun Heng Ho. 2019. A Usability Evaluation of Diabetes Mobile Applications. Vol. 11568 LNCS. Springer International Publishing.
  6. Huang, Zhao, and Morad Benyoucef. 2014. “Usability and Credibility of E-Government Websites.” Government Information Quarterly 31(4):584–95. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.002.
  7. Hussain, Azham, Hamisu Ibrahim Abubakar, and Norlaily Binti Hashim. 2015. “Evaluating Mobile Banking Application: Usability Dimensions and Measurements.” Conference Proceedings - 6th International Conference on Information Technology and Multimedia at UNITEN: Cultivating Creativity and Enabling Technology Through the Internet of Things, ICIMU 2014 (1):136–40. doi: 10.1109/ICIMU.2014.7066618.
  8. Lewis, James R. 2018a. “Measuring Perceived Usability : The CSUQ , SUS , and UMUX Measuring Perceived Usability : The CSUQ , SUS , and UMUX.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 00(00):1–9. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2017.1418805.
  9. Lewis, James R. 2018b. “The System Usability Scale : Past , Present , and Future The System Usability Scale : Past , Present , and Future.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 00(00):1–14. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307.
  10. Lewis, James R., and James R. Lewis. 2019. “Item Benchmarks for the System Usability Scale Item Benchmarks for the System Usability Scale.” (January).

How to Cite

Palyama, D. G., & Tomasila, G. (2022). An Important Aspect of Satisfaction on Mobile Apps: An Usability Evaluation Based on Gender. JINAV: Journal of Information and Visualization, 3(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.jinav1568