OriginalPaper | Open access | Published: April 30, 2026

Option Pricing for Exchange Rate Hedging: Evaluation of Value at Risk, Sharpe Ratio, and Backtesting with Kupiec and Christoffersen Tests

Fahrudin Muhtarulloh, Rd. Ilfah Syarifah Humairo, Asti Meiza
JINAV: Journal of Information and Visualization, Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026), pp. 1-10 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.jinav4667 Published: 2026-04-30
Get Permissions

Abstract

Exchange rate fluctuations are a major source of risk in international transactions. This study evaluates the effectiveness of currency options as hedging instruments using Value at Risk (VaR) and Sharpe Ratio, and assesses risk model accuracy through backtesting using the Kupiec and Christoffersen tests. Monthly closing prices of USD/IDR and MYR/IDR from January 2022 to January 2025 were obtained from Investing.com. Option pricing was calculated using the Garman–Kohlhagen model, while VaR estimation employed variance–covariance and historical methods. The results show that model accuracy varies across methods and currencies. The effectiveness of options as hedging instruments depends on model parameters, option type, and historical data characteristics.

Keywords

References (19)

  1. Verawaty, V., Jaya, A. K., & Megawati, M. (2019). Determinan pengambilan keputusan lindung nilai (hedging) dengan instrumen derivatif valuta asing pada perusahaan manufaktur. Akuisisi, 15(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.24127/akuisisi.v15i1.281
  2. Hidayat, T., Oktaviano, B., & Baharuddin, R. (2023). Keputusan investasi berdasarkan literasi keuangan, pengetahuan investasi, dan persepsi risiko. Journal of Science and Social Research, 6(2), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.54309/jssr.v6i2.365
  3. Restrepo, C. A. D., & Ramírez, M. I. R. (2021). Efficiency of option market as an exchange rate risk hedging instrument. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Management, Economics & Finance. Universidad Libre, Colombia.
  4. Sunaryo, T. (2007). Manajemen risiko finansial. Penerbit Salemba.
  5. Fajar, M. A. (2020). Analisis perbandingan kinerja saham syariah dan saham konvensional berdasarkan return, rasio Sharpe, rasio Jensen dan rasio Treynor di sektor manufaktur Bursa Efek Indonesia. Fokus Ekonomi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, 15(2), 445–461.
  6. Nuryanto, T. S., Prahutama, A., & Hoyyi, A. (2018). Historical simulation untuk menghitung value at risk pada portofolio optimal berdasarkan single index model menggunakan GUI MATLAB (studi kasus: Kelompok saham JII periode Juni–November 2017). Jurnal Gaussian, 7(4), 408–418.
  7. Yuliah, Y., & Triana, L. (2021). Pengukuran value at risk pada aset perusahaan dengan simulasi Monte Carlo. Jurnal Valuasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 1(1), 48–57.
  8. Acerbi, C., & Székely, B. (2019). Backtesting expected shortfall. Risk Magazine, 32(11), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.21314/RISK.2019.32.11.76
  9. Angelidis, T., & Degiannakis, S. (2020). Backtesting VaR models: A review and new evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 69, 101463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101463
  10. Christoffersen, P., & Pelletier, D. (2021). Backtesting value-at-risk: A duration-based approach. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 19(2), 305–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbaa019

How to Cite

Muhtarulloh, F., Humairo, R. I. S., & Meiza, A. (2026). Option Pricing for Exchange Rate Hedging: Evaluation of Value at Risk, Sharpe Ratio, and Backtesting with Kupiec and Christoffersen Tests. JINAV: Journal of Information and Visualization, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.jinav4667

Copyright & license

Copyright (c) 2026 Fahrudin Muhtarulloh, Rd. Ilfah Syarifah Humairo, Asti Meiza